Wednesday, June 8, 2011

acura tl type s wheels

acura tl type s wheels. 2002 TL Type-S | 2005 Escaladeacura tl type s wheels. 2002 TL Type-S | 2005 Escalade
  • 2002 TL Type-S | 2005 Escalade



  • kumarc123
    01-15 06:23 PM
    I called but I got the immigration subcommittee's VM. I left a message with my name and the reason I was calling.

    Thanks for calling, try to call again, and ask the receptionist to transfer to the the person who handles the immigration department. Tell him the need for recapture visa bill, as you plan to buy homes. And how this bill will help in towards minimizing the housing crisis and the downfall of the economy.


    Please I humbly request all IV members to call her office.



    Thank you





    acura tl type s wheels. I had a 08 Acura TL Type-Sacura tl type s wheels. I had a 08 Acura TL Type-S
  • I had a 08 Acura TL Type-S



  • nmdial
    08-04 11:02 AM
    am staying in US for d past 4 yrs ,have a H1 B visa. i want to invite my younger brother and mom for a ONE month visit to US.My mom has already got 10 yrs of visa as she visited dis place in 2008. My brother has just completed his engineering , is 21 yrs of age and has got placed in infosys.His joining date is in December, so would it be easy for him to get d visitors visa as even i want him to have some fun b4 starting off with his work life. Should he carry his offer letter with him and also would it b wise to book d ticket in advance and show them d return ticket as a proof just to tell them tat he will b back in a month and also would like to know the other questions which r expected. Please HELP.Looking forward to your replies

    thanks in advance:)

    I am in a similar boat as I want to invite my sister on a visitor visa for a month here. I think, any document that supports the fact that the visitor will return to India is always helpful.





    acura tl type s wheels. 2003 Acura Tl Type S Rims caracura tl type s wheels. 2003 Acura Tl Type S Rims car
  • 2003 Acura Tl Type S Rims car



  • tnite
    06-18 08:56 PM
    Is the visa number the red colored number on the visa stamp or something else?

    thanks
    \yes it is the red colored number on the visa stamp





    acura tl type s wheels. 04 Acura TL: 05 Scion tC: 98acura tl type s wheels. 04 Acura TL: 05 Scion tC: 98
  • 04 Acura TL: 05 Scion tC: 98



  • dvb123
    02-13 01:08 PM
    Kiss your green card dream goodbye



    more...


    acura tl type s wheels. 04 Acura TL: 05 Scion tC: 98acura tl type s wheels. 04 Acura TL: 05 Scion tC: 98
  • 04 Acura TL: 05 Scion tC: 98



  • gc_bulgaria
    10-09 04:18 PM
    http://www.immigration-law.com/

    10/08/2007: I-140 Portability After 180 Days of 485 Filing and Service Centers Standard Procedure of Review and Adjudication


    When there is a retrogression of visa numbers and anticipated long delays in 485 adjudication due to the massive July VB fiasco 485 filings, it is anticipated that there will be a substantial number of 485 applicants who may have to change employment along the way, either voluntarily or involuntarily, under AC 21 Section 106(c) provision. Accordingly, whether one reports the change of employment proactively or not, one should learn the internal review and adjudication procedures within the Service Center which are adopted by the adjudicators in adjudicating such I-485 applications.
    The good material to review on this procedure is the USCIS Standard Operating Procedure for the adjudicators. The SOP states that "If the alien is using the portability provisions of AC21 106(c), the adjudicator must determine that both the ported labor certification and the ported I-140 are still valid under the current employer, especially in regards to the continual payment of the prevailing wage, similar occupation classification, and the employer’s ability to pay the prevailing wage."

    (1) Prevailing Wage Payment: The AC 21 106(c) does not specifically require that the new employer pays the prevailing wage or higher wage for portability. However, the adjudicators review the wage as part of their determination of "continuing validity" of the ported certified labor certification application and I-140 petition. When the applicant stays with the same employer without changing employer, payment of wage less than the prevailing wage should not present any serious issue inasmuch as the employer establishes that the employer was financially able to pay the prevailing wage and is continuously able to pay the prevailing wage until the green card is approved. However, when there is a change of employer who pays less than the prevailing wage, there is no clear-cut rule with reference to this issue. Payment of less than prevailing wage thus potentially can raise two issues when there is a change of employer. One is the adjudicator's argument that there is no continuing validity of the labor certification or I-140 petition. The other is the argument that different wage reflects that the labor certification job and the new job with the new employer are two different occupational classifications.

    (2) Similar occupational classification issue: The similarity of the two positions involves not the "jobs" but "occupational classification." Accordingly, the old and new positions do not necessarily have to match exactly in every details, especially specific skill sets. Currently, the USCIS is looking up the Labor Department SOC/OES classifications of occupations. When the two jobs fall under the same occupational classification in the DOL occupational definitions, the two jobs are generally considered "similar" occupational classification. As long as the two jobs belong to a similar occupational classification, the applicant can work for the new employer anywhere in the United States. There is no physical location restrictions.

    (3) Employer's financial ability to pay the wage: Again, AC 21 106(c) does not specifically require that the new employer must prove that the new employer has and will have a financial ability to pay the prevailing wage. However, the adjudicators appear to review the portability case considering the new employer's ability to pay as well as part of review of continuing vality of labor certification and I-140 petition.
    Remember that when there is a portability issue, two things can ensue. If one proactively reports the eligibility of portability meeting all the foregoing requirment, the adjudicators are likely to decide the pending I-485 application on the merit. However, if the 485 applicants do not report proactively change of employment and the USCIS somehow obtains information of the alien's change of employment, for instance, by employer's report of termination of employment or withdrawal of I-140 petition or substitution of alien beneficiary, then 485 applicants are likely to be served a notice of intent to deny I-485 applications or in most cases, the adjudicator transfers the I-485 file to the local district office for interview.

    In AC 21 106(c) portability situation, the adjudicators also review the issue of the continuing validity of labor certification and I-140 petition involving the original employer, and are likely to raise similar issues which are described above. However, when the alien ports with the "approved" I-140 petition with a copy of the last paycheck and W-2, the adjudicators rarely revisit the original employer's foregoing issues in determining the 140 portability issue. The issues are raised when the alien ports before the I-140 petition is approved. Under the Yates Memorandum, when the alien ports before I-140 petition is approved, the alien has a burden of proof that the I-140 petition was approvable. Accordingly, inasmuch as I-140 petition was approvable and the alien ports after 180 days of I-485 filing, even if the original employer withdraws the I-140 petition, the pending I-485 will not be affected. Yates Memorandum indicates that in such a circumstance, the adjudicator should adjudicate the pending I-140 petition and if finds approvable, then recognizes 106(c) portability and continues to adjudicate the pending I-485 application. Without doubt, in the foregoing situation, the adjudicator will intensively and carefully review the issue of continuing validity of labor certification and I-140 petition issues which are specified above, particularly the employer's financial ability to pay the wage, and the applicant will have to overcome tremendous hurdles to deal with the challenges by the USCIS. Accordingly, people should not port before I-140 petition is approved unless they are assured that the original employer will continuously cooperate and support his/her green card process.





    acura tl type s wheels. i have mint type s wheelsacura tl type s wheels. i have mint type s wheels
  • i have mint type s wheels



  • willgetgc2005
    07-31 10:47 AM
    Hi,

    My wife is on H4 and I am on H1. We both have EAD. How ever, I have not converted to EAD and intend to be on H1 till i get my GC. Also our H4 and H1 3 year extensions are pending with CSC. My wife has a job offer for which she will need to use her EAD. The question is:


    1) Can she change her status to EAD while her H4 extension is pending ?

    2) Will her working on EAD jeopardise her H4 extension adjudication ? We want to maintain valid H4 as a backup.


    3) What is the process for her to convert from H4 to EAD. Do we have to inform uscis ?

    4) Is required, can she change her status form EAD to h4 (if we maiantain valid H4 as well)


    Your quick response is appreciated. Thank You.



    more...


    acura tl type s wheels. 29 Apr 11 Acura TL Type-S: Setacura tl type s wheels. 29 Apr 11 Acura TL Type-S: Set
  • 29 Apr 11 Acura TL Type-S: Set



  • kart2007
    05-21 09:02 PM
    b. Do not make photocopies of official US Documents. Its a violation.


    This is news to me.





    acura tl type s wheels. 2004 Acura TL 3.2L V6acura tl type s wheels. 2004 Acura TL 3.2L V6
  • 2004 Acura TL 3.2L V6



  • saimrathi
    07-03 09:21 AM
    Sorry if you find it offensive, but I dont think its going to prove anything to the USCIS and I am not even sure they will notice it.
    Why is no one talking about a public demonstartion in New York or something along those lines that is bound to get TV reporters attention and having a spokesperson who can speak on our behalf in front of a national audience and talk about the discrimintaion that US shows against legal workers
    If Illegal Immigrants have the courage to pursue their agenda on the streets what is stopping us from doing it.
    What are we afraid of? its not the lack of issues, its the lack of resolve
    Lets see if thread swells to dewcent levels we can organize a protest against USCIS infront of NBC studios

    I hope you get a day off from work for doing that..



    more...


    acura tl type s wheels. Model: Acura TL S-TYPEacura tl type s wheels. Model: Acura TL S-TYPE
  • Model: Acura TL S-TYPE



  • thescadaman
    07-26 08:40 PM
    I used your website to search "USPS Express" and I got the answer I needed very quickly. Thanks for the website..

    For everyones else benefit...

    for cases that has to be filed by overnight courier that is by the USPS Express Mail the center will only pick up mails from the U.S Postal Service once a day and in the morning. Therefore any mail that is not picked up in the morning will be picked only the following day and is given a next day receipt date.

    link
    http://www.immigration.com/fromtheagency/nsc112006.html





    acura tl type s wheels. Acura TL A specacura tl type s wheels. Acura TL A spec
  • Acura TL A spec



  • dpp
    01-07 08:25 PM
    B. Provisions in Cases of Revocation of the Approved Form I-140

    Subject: Guidance for Processing Form I-485 in Accordance with Section 106(c) of AC21

    As discussed above, if an alien is the beneficiary of an approved Form I-140 and is also the beneficiary of a Form I-485 that has been pending 180 days or longer, then the approved Form I-140 remains valid with respect to a new offer of employment under the flexibility provisions of �106(c) of AC21.

    Accordingly, if the employer withdraws the approved Form I-140 on or after the date that the Form I-485 has been pending 180 days, the approved Form I-140 shall remain valid under the provisions of �106(c) of AC21. It is expected that the alien will have submitted evidence to the office having jurisdiction over the pending Form I-485 that the new offer of employment is in the same or similar occupational classification as the offer of employment for which the petition was filed. Accordingly, if the underlying approved Form I-140 is withdrawn, and the alien has not submitted evidence of a new qualifying offer of employment, the adjudicating officer must issue a Notice of Intent to Deny the pending Form I-485. See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(16)(i). If the evidence of a new qualifying offer of employment submitted in response to the Notice of Intent to Deny is timely filed and it appears that the alien has a new offer of employment in the same or similar occupation, the BCIS may consider the approved Form I-140 to remain valid with respect to the new offer of employment and may continue regular processing of the Form I-485. If the applicant responds to the Notice of Intent to Deny, but has not established that the new offer of employment is in the same or similar occupation, the adjudicating officer may immediately deny the Form I-485. If the alien does not respond or fails to timely respond to the Notice of Intent to Deny, the adjudicating officer may immediately deny the Form I-485.

    If approval of the Form I-140 is revoked or the Form I-140 is withdrawn before the alien’s Form I-485 has been pending 180 days, the approved Form I-140 is no longer valid with respect to a new offer of employment and the Form I-485 may be denied. If at any time the BCIS revokes approval of the Form I-140 based on fraud, the alien will not be eligible for the job flexibility provisions of �106(c) of AC21 and the adjudicating officer may, in his or her discretion, deny the attached Form I-485 immediately. In all cases an offer of employment must have been bona fide, and the employer must have had the intent, at the time the Form I-140 was approved, to employ the beneficiary upon adjustment. It should be noted that there is no requirement in statute or regulations that a beneficiary of a Form I-140 actually be in the underlying employment until permanent residence is authorized. Therefore, it is possible for an alien to qualify for the provisions of �106(c) of AC21 even if he or she has never been employed by the prior petitioning employer or the subsequent employer under section 204(j) of the Act.



    more...


    acura tl type s wheels. 2007 Acura Tl Type S Rims.acura tl type s wheels. 2007 Acura Tl Type S Rims.
  • 2007 Acura Tl Type S Rims.



  • snaidu
    05-29 04:11 PM
    AVS channel has an indian program every saturday starting 10am -12.00pm

    I am sure many indians watch this.There is also 'free' immigration advise by some lawyers at the end of the program.


    If some one has contacts at AVS may be IV could get more coverage.

    Thinking out loud..





    acura tl type s wheels. Type-S Tails and Sidemarkersacura tl type s wheels. Type-S Tails and Sidemarkers
  • Type-S Tails and Sidemarkers



  • nomorelogins
    03-25 04:09 PM
    just remember to keep off any bread that has poppy seeds in it
    :eek:



    more...


    acura tl type s wheels. the type s rims n spoileracura tl type s wheels. the type s rims n spoiler
  • the type s rims n spoiler



  • EndlessWait
    12-13 02:55 PM
    its a "carrot dangling" technique used by the immigration system here to make u "modern day slave" to get things done....they will take ur SS taxes and make u wait until you realize and give up and go back

    i really wish the reality of this immigration was known to me when I came..I wasted my career waiting in this GC wait.... :mad:





    acura tl type s wheels. 2007 Acura TL Type-S Road Testacura tl type s wheels. 2007 Acura TL Type-S Road Test
  • 2007 Acura TL Type-S Road Test



  • chinna2003
    07-03 09:26 AM
    Its better than not going to work and sitting at home playing with your kids or watching movies or shopping at walmart or doing laundry etc etc mulling about your future if you have time to spare for a thought
    Who said the demonstrations have to be on weekday. You can very well do it on weekends and you can do it during your lunch breaks . What we lack is resolve not resources
    I hope everybody agrees with that



    more...


    acura tl type s wheels. 2003 Acura TL 3.2 Type-S,acura tl type s wheels. 2003 Acura TL 3.2 Type-S,
  • 2003 Acura TL 3.2 Type-S,



  • raj2007
    06-21 03:52 AM
    In case the I-485 is filed concurrently with I-140 or on the basis of a I-140 "pending approval", if the "I-140" is rejected (say because it was incorrectly classified as EB-2 when it should have been EB-3), then is the I-485 also automatically rejected? (My guess: YES)

    If this happens to you, does this mean you may not be able to resubmit I-485 if your "priority date" is not current at the time you came to know it got rejected? (My guess: YES... and this is a scary scenario.)

    Finally, if the I-140 (EB2) is mentions the requirement to be "BS + 5 years of post BS experience", but the the reviewing officer thinks that the 140 application is not supported by "proper" evidence of 5 years of progressive post BS experience.... then would it generate an RFE or would it straightaway cause a rejection of the I-140?

    Experts, please comment. I may have to face this scenario.

    Thanks!

    Abhijit
    Contribution so far: $100

    You should get RFE but rules are changing all the time. If you are not sure file 2nd I-140 with EB3.





    acura tl type s wheels. 2007 Acura TL Type S - Acuraacura tl type s wheels. 2007 Acura TL Type S - Acura
  • 2007 Acura TL Type S - Acura



  • irrational
    06-19 09:12 AM
    Thanks Folks,
    I will efile today and I'll let you guys know how it turns out.

    -Bipin



    more...


    acura tl type s wheels. 2003 Acura TL 3.2 Type S Wheelacura tl type s wheels. 2003 Acura TL 3.2 Type S Wheel
  • 2003 Acura TL 3.2 Type S Wheel



  • chanduv23
    10-26 06:54 AM
    Try

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/index.php

    and then click on "new posts"

    looks like they are fixing this issue





    acura tl type s wheels. 2003 Acura TL 3.2 Type S Wheelacura tl type s wheels. 2003 Acura TL 3.2 Type S Wheel
  • 2003 Acura TL 3.2 Type S Wheel



  • sac-r-ten
    04-01 09:10 AM
    Already got it....last September. Thanks for asking.


    Congrats to GreenGuru. and thanks for sharing all the information.

    IV admin, can we have a separate option on the details to show that GC is already received. Like rb_248 got it last september and he/she still comes here and shares his knowledge. so having that option display would be gr8.

    cheers/





    acura tl type s wheels. Acura Tl Type S Wheelsacura tl type s wheels. Acura Tl Type S Wheels
  • Acura Tl Type S Wheels



  • eb2_mumbai
    09-11 10:27 AM
    I can share my experience. I had BE + 3 Yr Exp + MS + 1.5 Yr Exp when I filed for GC. My employer filed the labor that was MS + 0 Yr exp. He said we cannot claim 1.5 Yr post MS since it was in house experience. The experience I gained after BS was not eligible so he said the post would go as MS + 0 . We did attach my experience certificate for work after BS (nothing for work experience in the same company) as supplimental qualification.

    I know lots of friends working in expedia who were hired from our graduate school and their labor were all MS + 0 in EB2





    forgerator
    11-08 04:38 PM
    You are right on target, YES when the requirements are higher than similar positions in the industry DOL send RFP to prove business necessity for higher requirements.

    If they suspect any fraud then your employer will be asked for supervised recruitment effort

    Second, Your salary should reflect the (higher) qualifications, higher than prevailing!

    Third, if the requirement is MS+7yrs of experience, do you have 7yrs of experience after receiving your MS?;)

    I am in a similar situation where I am going to start my EB2 , however the internal job requirements for my position demand more than what the EB2 requirements are. They are as following:

    Bachelors plus 6-8 yrs experience
    or alternatively
    Masters plus 4-6 yrs experience.

    I do have Masters and my overall experience is 5.5 yrs but out of that 4.5 yrs were with the current employer so those won't be counted. How will I become eligible for EB2? Will the lawyer downgrade the requirement to Masters + 1 yr experience or will he keep requirement to say Masters + 4yr ? I guess I'm confused how this will work. :o





    kunjirs
    03-07 04:16 PM
    MurthyDotCom : EAD Extension Delays - FAQs, Answers, Suggestions (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_eadmor.html)



    No comments:

    Post a Comment