Friday, June 10, 2011

fabolous and amber rose

images starring Amber Rose. fabolous and amber rose. Beyonce, Amber Rose,
  • Beyonce, Amber Rose,



  • misanthrope
    10-09 05:38 PM
    Leave Nov visa bulletin, I am more interested in November pay check, thank to this economy.

    ROTFL !!!





    wallpaper Beyonce, Amber Rose, fabolous and amber rose. Amber Rose recently took to
  • Amber Rose recently took to



  • PD_Dec2002
    07-13 01:42 PM
    I had to generate paystubs for my wife from Jan 07 to May 07 due to recent USCIS goof up. She started working from May 07. However all the paystubs generated ( 5) , have a pay period from 05/01 - 05/31 and pay date is 07/11

    Does anyone know if it is ok to have the 5 paystubs with the same pay period. The Lca talks about salary per year. The employers claims that it is ok. What should I do in this case. Any suggestions are highly appreciated.

    So let me summarize this so I understand well.

    Your wife started work only in June 2007. But you wanted to show USCIS that your wife was actually working from Jan 2007. So you asked her employer to give pay stubs for Jan - May 2007. The employer did that (and I am guessing) without really paying you for those months. And you paid taxes (Federal and State) and SS and Medicare for those months in July.

    So USCIS and IRS will both think that your wife has been working since Jan 2007 when in reality she started only in June 2007.

    Thanks,
    Jayant





    fabolous and amber rose. PICS : AMBER ROSE HIP HOP
  • PICS : AMBER ROSE HIP HOP



  • thomachan72
    09-04 08:46 AM
    Hello,
    Last November I quit my job in the US and left the country as well. Two days ago, I received an email saying my 485 is approved, and card production was ordered. The card will go to an address in the US where someone can forward me the mail.
    What should I do? Try to enter the U.S. with the card? What to say to POE officials? WIll I be questioned?
    Thanks.
    Did you leave the country on your own will or were you let go by the employer? Just curious. Hope things work out.





    2011 Amber Rose recently took to fabolous and amber rose. Amber Rose Stars in Fabolous#39;
  • Amber Rose Stars in Fabolous#39;



  • hpandey
    06-25 09:39 AM
    What GLUS said is right but the problem is that it was lost 15 years back . There might not be computerized records from that time or if by luck there are they must be archived that there would be no way to retreive them.

    Try harder to get any kind of records that you or your lawyer or anyone else in your family might have as additional proof.

    And file for the documents as mentioned above . God knows you might get lucky !



    more...


    fabolous and amber rose. Amber Rose and Fabolous
  • Amber Rose and Fabolous



  • SunnySurya
    11-02 05:09 PM
    Yeah! let us all right to John McCain!
    All,

    Please CONGRATULATE to the new President on Tuesday by all channels and DEFINITELY ASK the question " Now that you are the president, do you want to further punish us for being legal and sticking to the rules and hence make us wait forever in these long painful EB2/EB3-I long queues, . Mention about 5882, small admin fix.
    or
    does he want to give us some immediate relief. Dont forget to mention we can buy houses, not new job applicants, legal etc and HIgh-skilled.
    Thanks,





    fabolous and amber rose. likes of Amber Rose, Jayz,
  • likes of Amber Rose, Jayz,



  • upuaut
    09-19 01:15 AM
    Painter 7 like Painter 6 should have come with a manual. The one I got with 6.0 is very extensive and well formated to teaching the programs finer aspects.

    if you bought it and didn't get a manual.. I'd complain. If you didn't buy it.. you'll probebly have to slug through it and learn as you discover stuff. Painter itself is not really a well documented programs as these things go. I've never seen a book that details it yet.

    I will be stopping by B&N in the next couple of days. I'll be sure to take a look on the shelf to see if there is anything around that might help you out.

    Sorry I can't be of more help. I do know what you mean about it being an extensive program. 6.0 has so many features I can rarely keep track of them all. I'm usually looking things up to see how I can do them.



    more...


    fabolous and amber rose. Fabolous and Trey Songz Amber
  • Fabolous and Trey Songz Amber



  • boreal
    09-03 03:44 PM
    Hello Folks,


    I also read, if there was a pending EAD renewal, your case might get looked at and instead of renewing your EAD, USCIS will rather give you GC - provided PD is current and there are no other issues.



    The USCIS systems are not that sophisticated as we think they are.
    For me, I have opened an SR on Aug 4, got CPO on Aug 11, then the SR response came on Aug19 saying that my GC has been approved :)

    ...and wait there's more!
    Aug 13 or so, they approved my pending EAD, this after approving GC on Aug 11. Lets give them a benefit of doubt assuming that their various servers didnt get synced up in those two days.

    Last week of August, they send me information on my AP that was approved earlier and for which i had my attorney send an enquiry (as I didnt receive the AP by then)....

    so basically what this shows is that mostly there exists a high disconnect in their various servers/databases, and most probably their processes are highly manual.

    Gist of this, highly disconnected systems and I dont think SR would lead to anything..


    But, yours looks like a porting case - so possibly they might have the wrong dates - it might help to open an SR or go for infopass...





    2010 PICS : AMBER ROSE HIP HOP fabolous and amber rose. starring Amber Rose.
  • starring Amber Rose.



  • gcdreamer05
    02-16 10:43 AM
    hi there is a clause "same or similar field", so as per shiela murthy, ron gotcher and prashanthi reddy, as long as you are in a IT related job its ok, you cannot go from IT to healthcare or cross fields.

    so you are safe.

    But find out from your attorney if it is mandatory to file Ac21, because as long as i know, some attorneys say not to file it, as it just causes more confusions. But find out if it is legal not to file Ac21.



    more...


    fabolous and amber rose. Fabolous And Amber Rose Deny
  • Fabolous And Amber Rose Deny



  • belmontboy
    07-01 02:30 PM
    thank you

    why are you thanking yourself? :D





    hair Amber Rose Stars in Fabolous#39; fabolous and amber rose. Amber Rose and Fabolous Shot
  • Amber Rose and Fabolous Shot



  • bestia
    07-19 12:18 PM
    Basically the receipt notice we will get soon would have a 'received date' and a 'notice date'.

    I read in another forum that 90-day count starts from the received date.

    I am not sure though!

    Why is it that important? Before EAD was taking about 1.5-2 months. Now it will take a lot more, more than 90 days. I don't think now they will care about that 90 days thing. It wasn't a law requiring them to issue EAD in that period, they were just saying "if you haven't received in 90 days - call us" - that's all.



    more...


    fabolous and amber rose. Amber Rose is a Hoe don#39;t
  • Amber Rose is a Hoe don#39;t



  • sprash
    03-08 11:49 AM
    My PD of JAN 27 05 became current with the March bulletin. While folks from TSC got GCs from March 2nd itself, NSC seemed to have little action.

    By some random combination of POJ options, which changed recently, I managed to get a service request in on March 2nd (Type of service requested: -- Outside Normal Processing Times). The same day, I had Infopass and I was told its been "Preadjudicated, under review" and there was some recent movement on my case (transfered internally). This got my spirits up, but in just 2 days, I got a pretty horrible response to my SR, which made me feel this is going to be an uphill battle:

    Due to the pending caseload at the Nebraska Service Center, the processing time of your I-485 application has been extended. Allow extra time for an Officer to review your application. Furthermore, if all initial evidence was not included with you application, or a question arose during adjudication that required a Request for Evidence, additional time would be needed.

    Your application remains awaiting review by an Officer and you will be notified as soon as a decision is made. The Service is waiting for VISA availability.

    If you have any further questions, please call the National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283.

    I was about to contact the state senator today, but early today morning we got our CPO emails.

    My case is pretty straight forward:
    Processing center: NSC
    PD: JAN 27 2005 non perm which got approved just in time for July 07 fiasco.
    I-485: July 07 filer
    RFE in Nov 2008 (immunizations for wife, she had taken certain waivers due to pregnancy --- and Employment verification for myself)
    Approval: Today (March 8th 2010)





    hot Amber Rose and Fabolous fabolous and amber rose. Kayne#39;s Ex, Amber Rose is
  • Kayne#39;s Ex, Amber Rose is



  • hibworker
    11-18 03:07 PM
    EB2, notice it says Sec. 203(b)(2) :)

    Here is more details from USCIS: USCIS - Employment-Based Immigration: Second Preference EB-2 (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60a RCRD)



    Hi,

    Yesterday i have received I-140 notice from my advocate and it is containg the below info.Can someone help me out is it for EB2 or EB3.

    Notice Type : Premium Processing Receipt notice

    Amount Received : $ 1475.00
    Section : Mem of profession w/adv deg,or of exceptn'l ability
    Sec .203(b)(2)

    Can some one please helpme out in this regard.

    Thanks in Advance,
    Vavuvya.



    more...


    house Amber Rose at Fabolous#39; fabolous and amber rose. Em [starring Amber Rose]
  • Em [starring Amber Rose]



  • ski_dude12
    02-17 09:51 PM
    We had out fingerprinting done 3 weeks back.





    tattoo likes of Amber Rose, Jayz, fabolous and amber rose. Jay-Z, and Amber Rose attended
  • Jay-Z, and Amber Rose attended



  • cooldude
    11-02 07:26 PM
    I am able to see my EAD and AP online, but not I-1485. Don't worry, it should be there probaby next week.



    more...


    pictures Fabolous and Trey Songz Amber fabolous and amber rose. Fabolous talks Amber Rose,
  • Fabolous talks Amber Rose,



  • gc_check
    06-13 08:21 AM
    IV core shud approach republicans who are saying no amnesty to law breakers.
    Let us approach them and convince them to bring amendments to reward law abiding people like us.

    Core along with the lobbyist will certainly be looking for all available options, to work on.... But this is affected by the funds they have also.... Non-core can assist with the action items proposed by the core and with the funds.





    dresses Kayne#39;s Ex, Amber Rose is fabolous and amber rose. Amber Rose is rumoured to be
  • Amber Rose is rumoured to be



  • ragz4u
    01-25 11:53 AM
    What is lobbying and is it legal?
    As per the definition at Wikipedia, Lobbying is the practice of private advocacy with the goal of influencing a governing body by promoting a point of view that is conducive to an individual's or organization's goals. more information can be found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobbying

    It is 100% legal and is in fact the preferred way of getting things done by most corporations. Corporations like Microsoft, Dell, Yahoo, Google etc have all used lobbying in the past and in fact I would go as far as saying that every Fortune 1000 firm has used lobbying at one point of time or another. Just search for any company name and the word lobbying on Google and you'll see what we are talking about

    What has lobbying got to do with the Immigration Bill?

    As we know from part III, Senator Specter will be creating a markup of the Senate Immigration Bill. This may/may not contain the provisions that the immigrant community is looking for.

    The differennt bills that are being considered for the markup are McCain Kennedy bill, Cornyn Kyl bill, the Chuck Hagel Bill and a few others

    This document by AILA compares the various versions of the bill in different categories http://www.shusterman.com/pdf/immreform106.pdf. This also considers a markup of Senator Specter which is unofficial at the moment. This means that until it gets officially presented to the Judiciary Committee for review, it could change anytime.

    This markup already seems to contain the provisions we need, what are we still worried about?

    If you have read my post on S.1932, you would know that a bill can be amended at multiple stages.

    1) Senator Specter could change his markup, after all he has not come out with an official version. Do not forget that the link above refers to an unofficial version of the markup. As per unconfirmed reports, the Chairman's markup could be out anytime between now and mid-march and a lot of things could change in the mean time

    2) Assuming that the markup does contain the provisions that we as immigrants are fighting for, any judiciary committee member can propose an amendment to the bill which could result in a an unwanted change. A case in point is the amendment that Senator Diane Feinstein proposed during S.1932 which reduced the increase in H1B visas from 60,000 to 30,000. Imagine if a senator brings in an amendment that strips off all the provisions for legal immigration!

    3) If the bill does not have strong support within the Judiciary committee, it could be voted out and it becomes history

    4) Assuming that the bill passes through the above steps, it is presented to the full Senate for a debate and vote. Here too any member of the senate can propose an amendment to the bill and the house votes on it. A case in point is the Byrd Amendment which was introduced by Senate Byrd from Virginia which sought to drop sections 8001 and 8002 from the S.1932. This was defeated by the a margin of 84-15 but remember that if it had enough support, S.1932 would have ended here

    5) Once the bill passes with the immigration provisions in the Senate, it is presented to a joint conference committee where a few senators and a few congressmen deliberate on which sections to include int he conference bill from among the House bill and the Senate bill. Remember that the house bill has already been passed (HR.4437) and it does not contain any immigration provisions. The House members could again force the senate representatives to drop the immigration provisions. The S.1932 bill's pro-immigration sections got dropped precisely at this juncture

    So as can be seen, there are various stumbling blocks towards achieving a favorable bill.

    The only way we can ensure that the pro-immigrant provisions do not get ignored or sacrificed is by lobbying. By lobbying we can ensure that the right folks at the right places can understand our concern and empathize with us.

    A lobbying firm can ensure that we send a consistent and effective message to the right people. As mentioned earlier, some of the lobbying firms have ex-Congressmen and ex-Senators on their boards. These folks have a great working relationship with the current senators and congressmen. These lobbyists can not only get our issues be heard by the powers, they can possibly influence them by using some political capital

    Why can't we just contact the lawmakers directly and tell them about it? Why spend money for lobbyists?

    We can definitely try doing this ourselves. This is a free country and nothing stops us from doing so. Unfortunately the effectiveness of such a method is questionable.

    During S.1932 proceedings, many members of this forum contacted their local congressmen and senators and asked for appointments. Many also conveyed their views to the staff and many also faxed their views in. Unfortunately the bill passed without the pro-immigration provisions. The message was not conveyed strongly enough and it was conveyed as individuals and not a group.

    It was realized that unless we present our case the way Washington, DC is used to seeing it (by hiring lobbyists), the message will not get through.

    Lobbyists have direct access to the actual congressmen and senators while the most we can hope is getting a key staff member's attention.

    A lobbyist can influence a house member, while we can only hope that the staff members pass our views to the house member.

    We do not know which members are really the ones to target and key decision makers and we might end up concentrating on the wrong house members. A lobbyist can help us identify these key members.

    All in all, a lobbyist can help us use our energy in the right way and not end up wasting it doing frivolous things and ultimately help us achieve our dreams

    And do not forget that some of the anti-immigration groups like numbersusa already have full time lobbyists working for them in DC. If we are to even put up a decent fight against these very dedicated anti-immigrant forces, we need to get help from a professional lobbying firm



    more...


    makeup Fabolous And Amber Rose Deny fabolous and amber rose. Amber Rose at Fabolous#39;
  • Amber Rose at Fabolous#39;



  • ss777
    02-12 06:54 AM
    Is your I-140 at TSC? Do you have any other I-140 or I-485 pending/Approved at TSC? They may be trying to consolidate all the cases.





    girlfriend Jay-Z, and Amber Rose attended fabolous and amber rose. Amber Rose, Rosa Acosta,
  • Amber Rose, Rosa Acosta,



  • nixstor
    12-02 10:42 PM
    IV is not for any particular nationals. While ROW is also affected because of retrogression, India and China are severely affected and there is hardly any movement in EB2/3 for India. The hard country limits in EB system and inability to capture unused visa numbers are just 2 of the many reasons responsible for retrogression. These forums have been misused by some people to advertise about their firm. May be the other member skimmed through the post and considered it a similar ad. OP has given a fitting response. Welcome to IV.





    hairstyles Amber Rose is a Hoe don#39;t fabolous and amber rose. Amber Rose spotted leaving
  • Amber Rose spotted leaving



  • GCeffect
    02-09 05:22 AM
    Last week i received a RFE against my I485 application. My PD is not current yet. I''m kind of confused about the RFE. I need some help from you guys...

    Check out the RFE letter comment at the following:
    """""USCIS records indicate that you began your employment with compnay A in October 2005. However, the record indicates that the i-129, H1b, granting your authorization to work for company A was not filed until aug, 2006. Submit documentatary evidence that you were authorized to work for compnay A when you began your employment in Oct 2005.""""

    Now let me explain my situation.
    I had my first H1b from compnay B, for three years (oct 2002 to oct 2005). Then I started my renewed my H1b under another company C. (oct/2005 to oct 2008). Then i received my PERM labor from another company A (the company they USCIS mentioned in their RFE). Both the company C and compnay A was owned by one person. So even i was working with the company C, my payroll was under Company A. Right after I received my labor certificate from Compnay A, my lawyer suggested my transfer my H1b from Compnay C to company A. Then i received my h1b approval for compnay A in Jan 2007 to october 2008. In 0ctober 2008 i renewed my h1b from compnay A again for one year. But in november compnay A terminted me and withdraw my H1b. I got a new job and moved to a new compnay in december 2008. Everything is normal after that until i received the RFE. I have to get back to USCIS in by the end of this month with the evidence. I has the legal status all the time i worked for all those companies.

    PLease let me know what you guys think about the whole situation.

    Thanks ahead about your concern ......

    EB3 (ROW)..PD May 2006





    anurakt
    12-27 11:11 AM
    anurakt, thanks for the update.

    There is no information or caption on our home page that clearly states that this site/group is for highly skilled immigrants. We should come up with a caption that would convey this and also convey that its for all countries. We can add this beside the immigration voice logo.

    The caption should be catchy and should convey the info....some thing like "by the people and for the people".


    update: there is info about highly skilled immigrants on the home page but not sure if some people would have time to read these (especially those who just come in from other websites and might think this site is one of those immigration sites)


    I think there is an article on front page. Also I am personnaly right now more interested in grass root state chapter person to person campaigning rather tha online campaigning. I think time has come to show the faces and numbers to each other. I appreciate your comments and my intention here is to just give an update. I am sure somebody from core is reading this and will take action if they like the idea....

    Thanks once again.





    gcseeker2002
    11-04 10:26 AM
    Did u take Infopass appt. for EAD & AP together...? On the infopass form once fill only one receipt # right..?? My application was recd. by USCIS on 7/7...90 days is from recd. date...isn't it..? and not Notice date.? 90 days will be up for me by tomorrow 11/5..I still have no EAD & AP..! Can i take EAD & AP appt. together on same day for Infopass.? Or should i call USCIS reg. my case...Thanks..!!
    There is no option in infopass to take both ead and AP. I took the one for interim-EAD , but like I mentioned above, this tuesday it will be 2 weeks after infopass and still no EAD for me, wonder how AP got approved without EAD , does it happen like this ?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment