Wednesday, June 8, 2011

job requisition

job requisition. Creating a new job requisition
  • Creating a new job requisition



  • absaarkhan
    06-12 05:54 PM
    What is "Letter of Acquirement’

    Can you please tell me what is "Letter of Acquirement’'

    My company is Acquired too, the New Employer just gave me a Letter Copy
    explaining the Merger, NO Official docs were shared with me.

    From whom did u get this letter.


    No need of new H1 if company 'B's' HR has agreed to continue with 'A''s employees.
    1. Get a EVL letter from company 'B'. (This is assuming name of 'A' will change to 'B' or new name.

    2. You need to get a "Letter of Acquirement" from HR of new company (I am assuming that the name of the company is changing as well). If name does not change then you should be fine. If you have to travel out of US, you need to carry latest copy of EVL(of new company) and "Letter of Acquirement" along with you. (I went thru these few years back, PwCC bought over by IBM, immediately after the takeover I travelled out of US and came back without any problems(on H1)) this was quite a while back though, you may want to check with your company attorney though.

    Note:
    "Letter of Acquirement’ would state that your 'A' company was bought over by 'B' company on Date and name has now changed to 'B'.

    Good luck.

    GCCovet





    job requisition. open job requisitions are
  • open job requisitions are



  • learning01
    05-15 09:38 AM
    Bloomberg story at International Herald Tribune: U.S. firms press Congress to open door to technology workers (Link (http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/14/bloomberg/bximmigrate.php))

    Credit goes to Learning01 for initiating contact with Bloomberg and helping us with this

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=aZM1MDJr4Bio&refer=us





    job requisition. the entire job requisition
  • the entire job requisition



  • greenguru
    01-31 12:56 PM
    Hi ,
    Yes, it is possible.





    job requisition. Job requisition template
  • Job requisition template



  • Eternal_Hope
    05-10 05:07 PM
    If under the bullet point (b) you have an option to choose "other" then choose that.

    EAD is not a status; pending I-485 allows you to be "legally present" in the country without having a "legal status". Similarly, AP allows you to travel out of the country and reutrn without abandoning your pending I-485 application. (At least that's what my understanding is .....)

    All the best..... hope things work out well with your application .............



    more...


    job requisition. creates a job requisition
  • creates a job requisition



  • belmontboy
    02-15 01:29 PM
    If each state in India were a country

    There would have been no backlog.

    dude people are fighting EB2 Vs Eb3 war.
    Why do u want to ignite one state Vs another state war now??
    Don't u have better to do with your spare time?

    Admin, please delete this useless thread. We have enough topics to crib/fight/backstab about!!!





    job requisition. job requisition process it
  • job requisition process it



  • bestin
    10-21 09:40 PM
    140 APPROVED.

    In addition to the first RFE as above,i received one more RFE.In the second RFE they mentioned that education and experience satisfies labour,but wanted more documents from company to prove A2P.Company sent tax returns and got the approval in 6 days.Yet to receive the notice.


    Good luck to all waiting for approval.



    more...


    job requisition. Job Requisition and Interview
  • Job Requisition and Interview



  • calgirl
    08-12 06:19 PM
    Were these approved at NSC or TSC?
    Both are following this rule would be encouraging..

    Source:

    http://www..com/discussion-forums/i485-1/172162219/

    Posted by willcrack (74) 1 hour 51 minutes ago

    OK...now guys, strictly speaking the memo does not say anything about "conditional" GC...in legal speak. Just that they could revoke it if the person is considered inadmissable after the Name Check results come back. "Conditional GC" per se has the support of the actual statute only for Married to citizen, EB5 investment GC's etc.

    And now for those who feel that USCIS is not approving cases whose NC's are pending, I know 2 of my friends and I whose NC's were pending when the file was with the officer (and approved in a week) and in my case NC was pending even at 6:30pm eastern (when I called the second level IIO at the NCSC) the day before I got the CPO e-mail (next day at 9am).

    I have also seen several cases where people have called/went to Infopass after they got the GC to find out whether the NC was cleared....and it was pending !

    so this should throw away all apprehensions about the 180+ rule not being implemented out of the window...





    job requisition. from job requisition to
  • from job requisition to



  • gcwait2007
    10-21 10:29 AM
    Great Work Ashkam. Please accept my appreciations.

    Do you have any similar 'SOP' for I-140? I googled and could not find one.

    If you have one for I-140, can you pls post the same?

    Thanks in advance.



    more...


    job requisition. open job requisitions are
  • open job requisitions are



  • Jaime
    09-18 10:16 PM
    We saw many toddlers and older kids! Brave little ones!!!

    By the way chanduv, I looked for you everywhere! Too bad we didn't get to meet this time. You have done a truly amazing job and wanted to congratulate your in person! Hope to meet you soon!





    job requisition. Job Requisition Number 28099BR
  • Job Requisition Number 28099BR



  • starscream
    06-04 01:26 PM
    This is what I got from the below link

    http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/...0News/2359471/

    Chairman of the Asian Pacific American Caucus, Rep. Michael Honda, will hold a press conference on Thursday, June 4, at 12:00 p.m. on Cannon Terrace, or in case of rain Cannon House Office Building Room 441, to present key components of a comprehensive immigration package, in preparation for President Obama's reform agenda. Joining the Congressman will be other Members of Congress and supporting advocacy organizations. Rep Honda will discuss his Reuniting Families Act, to be introduced in Congress this week, and the need to reform America's family-based immigration system to end lengthy separations of loved ones, promote family stability and foster the economic growth that immigrant families have provided throughout our history.

    Provisions related to Employment based Greencards:
    *Recaptures unused family-based and employment-based visas previously allocated by Congress which remain unused.

    * Increases the per country limits of family and employment-based visas from 7% to 10%: Right now, each country only has a 7% share of the total cap of visas that Congress allocates each year. Increasing each country's percentage of visas would eliminate the absurdly long wait times for individuals to immigrant from certain countries like the Philippines, China, and India.

    This bill is similar to S 1085 introduced in the Senate with regard to employment-based visa provsions - basically recapture and increase per country limits from 7 to 10%

    Guys, there is nothing to be excited about for EB folks in this bill.. This appears to help FB folks and in the name of re-union, which is a good thing ofcourse but, for us.. If I read between the lines, I have a bad feeling... Are they trying to re-capture the EB wasted visa numbers along with FB wasted and allocate all those to FB folks? :confused:

    Let the EB folks live this same life?

    God knows...



    more...


    job requisition. Requisition item released
  • Requisition item released



  • kirupa
    04-22 05:22 PM
    sparky - I really like your third one. I haven't seen a lot of green stamps. Anyhoo, add some text like the dolllar/cent value of the stamp and I'll add it up :)





    job requisition. Click the New Job tab.
  • Click the New Job tab.



  • sanjay
    04-07 10:20 AM
    Is this something common?. I did not get any emails after that. Following is the relevant part of the email....

    "Application Type: I485 , APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS

    Current Status: Card production ordered.

    On April 3, 2008, we ordered production of your new card. Please allow 30 days for your card to be mailed to you. If we need something from you we will contact you. If you move before you receive the card, call customer service. You can also receive automatic e-mail updates as we process your case. Just follow the link below to register."

    What else do you want Bro. Give 30 days time to USCIS to send your card. we, most of us, would me more satisfied just to see the magical words - Current Status: Card production ordered in our case status.

    Regarding holding card in physically, have to wait some time. Which should not be more taxing than waiting to see the magical words.



    more...


    job requisition. Job requisition form - Infolizer
  • Job requisition form - Infolizer



  • ajju
    04-10 12:14 PM
    Please update your profile with details so that it can be helpful to everyone tracking the success
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/profile.php?do=editprofile

    on IV tracker
    http://immigrationvoice.org/index.php?option=com_tracker&Itemid=63

    IV members are requested to update their profile with valid dates so that we can make IV tracker helpful for everyone.

    I have personally decided to make this request to everyone who does not have their details completed and only then respond to the member. If a member has bogus data in their profile for tracking purposes I would not be replying to that post. This might help encourage members wanting replies from IV core team for their questions.

    Seems like a good tool.. But couldn't sort out by Nationality or country of chargeability.. The EB1/EB2 category works fine.. Not sure if its tracker issue.. or I am doing something wrong.. or missing any info in my tracker details...





    job requisition. Job Requisition
  • Job Requisition



  • julsun
    09-27 10:19 AM
    I filed for AOS in Aug 07, my attorney advised me that we could combine the checks payable to USCIS for family members (EG: in place of one check for my 485 and one more for my wife we could combine both the checks for 485 and issue a single check for twice the amount). Based on the above, i issued 1 check for 485, 1 for EAD, 1 for FP and 1 for AP.

    Now my checks have been cashed and i am able to see the receipt number on the back of the cashed check. I see two receipt numbers on the back of the checks for EAD and AP however i see only 1 receipt number on the back of the check for 485 (and the same number on the back of the check for FP)

    Did any body else also send combined checks? Did you get a single receipt number or multiple numbers?

    Thanks.

    My EAD cheques got encashed today. I had sent a single cheque for myself and my wife. I do notice two LIN numbers on the back of the cheque. BUT when i search for those numbers on USCIS website its says number DO NOT exist in the system. Has anyone faced similar issue?

    Thanks



    more...


    job requisition. the job requisition number
  • the job requisition number



  • vishwak
    08-05 02:14 PM
    I think he should consider awarding citizenship to LONG waiting GC applicants. :D

    Nice one.....lets wait and see.





    job requisition. Job Requisition/Posting
  • Job Requisition/Posting



  • shanti
    08-07 10:04 AM
    http://www.hooyou.com/lc/perm_eb2vseb3.html

    The job has to have a SVP greater than 8. If SVP is lower than 8 but they say that there is a business need for EB2 then you will need a level 3 salary -or higher-, if SVP is greater than 8 and is a job zone 5 then it has to be greater than level 1 for the area.
    Anyways it is a great question for the conference with the lawyer. http://online.onetcenter.org/find/re...=software&g=Go



    more...


    job requisition. Complete the job as shown
  • Complete the job as shown



  • Blog Feeds
    01-09 02:20 PM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:


    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QZpVppv4FTs/S0RsZr5XFgI/AAAAAAAAACc/m6OP7jHF9vY/s320/2010-01-07+international-business-industry-night.jpg (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QZpVppv4FTs/S0RsZr5XFgI/AAAAAAAAACc/m6OP7jHF9vY/s1600-h/2010-01-07+international-business-industry-night.jpg)By Deborah Notkin, AILA Past President


    Unfortunately, that's exactly what the Gutierrez bill is. While there are many excellent provisions on important components of immigration reform, especially family unity and legalization, the employment immigration provisions are overwhelmingly negative and geared to eliminate the employers from having any reasonable input on the specific types of foreign employees that are required in an evolving economy. The overarching provision is the establishment of a "Commission" that would determine U.S. immigration policy (numbers and categories) pertaining to temporary and permanent workers. A commission of seven "experts" would report to both houses of Congress annually the types and number of workers that could enter the U. S. Unless both houses of Congress acted to block them (a rarity in today's world), the Commission's "recommendations" would become the law of the land.


    There are a number of reasons why substituting Congress with a commission is a bad idea. First, we don't have the statistical evidence available to make good measurements on an annual basis. Second, government commissions in DC overwhelmingly end up becoming unelected political entities, with their own agendas, often exceeding their original mission. Third, a politicized commission on such a controversial issue would be especially problematic because it would not be accountable directly to voters as are elected representatives. In a debate on the Commission concept that I attended in New York, proponents were struggling to find even a few examples of Beltway government commissions that worked and did not become politicized.


    While the Gutierrez bill should be commended for including provisions requiring employers to take responsibility for utilizing ethical recruiters and providing a few exemptions from the employment based quota for certain types of professionals, it generally negates the legitimacy of corporate needs and lacks any concept of the global economy and the international, competitive personnel market.


    Most egregious is the idea of bringing in a lesser skilled workforce through a sort of "hiring hall" lottery system that would eliminate employers entirely from the selection process. Foreign workers would be placed in a database and assigned to employers based on some computer's or bureaucrat's idea of a match. It reminds one of the unfortunate migrants who are day workers standing outside waiting to be randomly hired. Here, they can just stand in their own countries being assigned to an employer they may not have chosen if given the choice.


    Additional provisions would eliminate the ability of employers to use entry level wages for entry level temporary workers. Forcing employers to pay foreign nationals more than their U.S. worker counterparts is totally absurd. Is this how we think America will benefit from the many foreign nationals who have just graduated from, among other fields, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathmatics, programs? And of course, the unworkable cap on H-1B temporary professional workers in a healthy economy is totally ignored, evidently to be left to the gang of seven commissioners.


    It appears that Congressman Gutierrez put his heart and soul into legalization and family unity but left the employment provisions to be drafted by the most anti-employer parties in this debate. Much is borrowed from the Durbin-Grassley proposed H-1B and L-1B provisions and the Economic Policy Institute's piece on immigration, which starts out by labeling all employers using foreign workers as participants in indentured servitude.


    I have only highlighted a few of the egregious provisions that promise to sink an otherwise good piece of legislation. And this does not serve anyone who sincerely wants to find a solution to the human tragedy faced by undocumented migrants in the United States.

    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-4566215004987922662?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/01/gutierrez-billa-good-legalization-and.html)





    job requisition. Approved job requisitions
  • Approved job requisitions



  • logiclife
    02-03 11:06 AM
    The bill seems to apply to future PhD candidates who will come on an "F4" visa. Will current PhD candidates who will graduate on an F1 visa be similarly able to adjust status after 1 year of employment? If it does not, the potential benefits will be seen only after 4-6 years, which is when new candidates on an F4 visa will be getting their PhDs!

    Also, are these clauses applicable to PhDs in the life sciences? The actual language seems to talk about the "physical sciences", which I think excludes the biological sciences/ biotech, one of the areas of greatest advancements in recent and future years!

    Interested individuals should contact lawmakers about these points and have them amend it!

    If they do implement a new F4 visa, they will allow you to transfer to F4 status I believe. And then current PhDs would be getting the benefit of the new law. Its unlikely that biological science are not a part of physical sciences. What they mean when they say "Physical" sciences is that other sciences like Tom Cruise's scientology and stuff like astrology/palmistry and other fake science is not included as a field in which one could do PhD and obtain GC.





    job requisition. a job requisition to human
  • a job requisition to human



  • TeddyKoochu
    12-28 12:21 PM
    Does the I-9 need to be refreshed each year?

    I have a copy of my Jan 2009 I-94 which is not the most recent one - I believe that was the one that was sent to my employer's lawyers. In Jan 2010, I did get an original I-94 (the one I lost) but did not use it to apply for I-9 (atleast to the best of my knowledge).

    Thanks for being so responsive and helping me out. The other thing is the time constraint that I have to take off on Dec 29th (tomorrow). What also worries me is that if I approach the Immigration/customs folks at the nearby airport, won't they basically ask me to fill an I-102 and wait for 3-6 months before I can travel? I don't want to do that since I need to travel now due to family issues.

    I don't know how often the I9 has to be refreshed but it maybe 6 months to a year when I came back last time my employer asked for the I94 for I9 filing so they may most likely have your I94#. The I94 is the one that determines our legal status. The I102 process is long and not worth it, try talking to the local customs and immigration folks I know it may sound scary but most likely if they cannot issue you a replacement one they won't prevent you from travelling. As long as they are able to create a departure record for you for the 29th that should be ok, normally that is what happens with the I94, the airline staff submits it to these folks who would scan and enter in the system. To make things easy the best way is if you can get the I94# in anyway or you can just choose to travel nothing should stop you, but its always good to be honest and report things to the concerned agencies. All the best and good luck.





    LOL123
    07-30 11:47 AM
    Bump >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>





    gc_chahiye
    01-22 08:39 PM
    http://www.murthy.com/news/n_inseb2.html

    Can somebody advise me wht should i do, should i apply new application or not ? does this mean that i cannot apply for LC nor I140 for the rest of the year for eb2 ? I have Master's and have over 6 years of exp.

    you can apply for LC and I-140. Its the I-485 that you cannot apply (& once you apply cant get approved) unless your date is current.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment