Thursday, June 9, 2011

picture of selena gomez mom and dad

images Selena gomez kissing gomezsome picture of selena gomez mom and dad. who is selena gomez mom and
  • who is selena gomez mom and



  • guchi472000
    02-12 10:58 AM
    I am in for Gandhigiri.:)





    wallpaper who is selena gomez mom and picture of selena gomez mom and dad. justin bieber#39;s mom and dad
  • justin bieber#39;s mom and dad



  • waiting4gc02
    06-19 12:44 PM
    EAD/AP's dates are back to normal ( ~90 days)

    So, stop panicking ppl..

    For once, USCIS, fixed there error ..fast enough..!!!

    Cheers..





    picture of selena gomez mom and dad. selena gomez mom and dad
  • selena gomez mom and dad



  • ajju
    09-26 04:05 PM
    ^^^^Bump^^^

    My lawyer asked for separate checks for each application.. FP is always added to I-485 fees.. But since they issued EAD receipt for you and spouse, that means definitely 2 485s... Guess you need to wait for the receipts to get the missing receipt # or you can call USCIS...





    2011 justin bieber#39;s mom and dad picture of selena gomez mom and dad. ♥Selena Gomez and The Scene♥
  • ♥Selena Gomez and The Scene♥



  • senthil
    03-22 02:31 AM
    our sympathies go over to families and friends that are hurt by this incident



    more...


    picture of selena gomez mom and dad. Selena Gomez Is Happy To Live
  • Selena Gomez Is Happy To Live



  • usr2004
    07-26 12:22 PM
    But I already filed my I-485 on July 12 th. I dont kow exact name they call for this type of I-140 filing, my attorney told me this is successor in interest.





    picture of selena gomez mom and dad. selena gomez#39;s mom and dad
  • selena gomez#39;s mom and dad



  • desi3933
    02-14 08:29 AM
    Hello all,

    Is there a law that grant green card for a person who's been in the States legally for more than 10 years?

    Thanks

    No, not that for 10 years.

    Howeve, the I-485 can be filed based on residency, if the applicant has been US resident since before Jan 1st, 1972.

    The applicant need to
    1. secure a signed SSA-795 from the individual indicating the beginning and ending dates of all periods of residence in the U.S. The statement does not have to include the complete street address. The town and/or State is sufficient.
    2. a statement which shows no absence of longer than 6 months is sufficient to determine continuous residence in the U.S. since before January 1, 1972.



    __________________
    Not a legal advice.



    more...


    picture of selena gomez mom and dad. The totally adorable Selena
  • The totally adorable Selena



  • Templarian
    08-20 04:01 PM
    Really nice one. The mouth is perfect. I think with some themes they sort of need an outline though, not all the themes use the default white I don't believe.





    2010 selena gomez mom and dad picture of selena gomez mom and dad. Selena gomez kissing gomezsome
  • Selena gomez kissing gomezsome



  • sankap
    07-05 03:28 PM
    http://online.wsj.com/article_print/SB118359095890657571.html

    Reversal Frustrates Green-Card Applicants
    By MIRIAM JORDAN
    THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: July 5, 2007

    The U.S. government's surprise offer, then abrupt reversal, of an opportunity for thousands of skilled foreign workers to obtain permanent residency in the U.S. highlights the problems of the overtaxed immigration system and the frenzy that results from a rare chance to apply for a green card.

    The scramble has put tens of thousands of workers and their families in limbo after many of them and their employers spent thousands of dollars in hopes of securing permanent residency. It may result in a class-action lawsuit against the government by frustrated applicants.

    The problem began June 12 when the government seemed to open the door for thousands of foreign workers and their families to end the long wait to apply for a green card. That is when the State Department published a Visa Bulletin, which is a monthly notice closely watched by immigration attorneys and their clients because it determines who is eligible to file a green-card application the next month. The June bulletin announced that practically all skilled foreign workers who had been previously deemed eligible for an employer-sponsored visa could now take the final step of applying for a green card.

    By law, the U.S. can issue about 140,000 employment-based green cards each year. Last year, the government fell short by about 10,000, despite the long waiting list; leftover visas can't be rolled over to the next year. The June announcement aimed to prevent the visa slot from going to waste, according to a State Department spokeswoman.
    [Green-Card Limbo]

    The announcement was greeted with a mix of jubilation and panic by thousands of engineers, lab scientists and other high-skilled foreigners who had waited years for their place in line. Working ahead of a July 2 date for filing the application, intending immigrants rushed to gather documents, complete paperwork and obtain medical exams. Many of their dependents -- such as children enrolled in college overseas -- boarded planes for the U.S. to meet a requirement that all family members be present at the time of filing.

    "The bulletin created a land rush among legal immigrants desperate to finalize their green-card applications," said Steve Miller, a Seattle-based immigration attorney and head of the state chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

    Then, on July 2, the State Department issued an "update" that reversed the previous bulletin. It stated, effective immediately, there would be no further authorizations for employment-based cases. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which processes the applications, said it would instead simply process existing applications to meet this year's quota. "We already had sufficient applications pending without new applicants," an agency spokesman said.

    Mike Aytes, head of domestic operations for the USCIS, said all 147,141 employment-based green cards have now been issued for the year. "We are very sympathetic to the fact that people really had expectations � Folks spent a lot of time and effort, but it turned out they couldn't file, after all," he said.

    In the July 2 announcement, USCIS said it was "rejecting applications" to secure green cards, and the agency spokesman said it would return the paperwork of all the applicants. New cases will be entertained again in the government's next fiscal year, starting Oct. 1. However, applicants must wait their turn again, which might not happen for years.

    News of the revocation of the previously announced bulletin dashed the hopes of thousands of foreign workers, many of them currently on an H-1B professional visa normally valid for up to six years. These workers face the possibility of being forced to return home if their visa expires before they get the chance to apply for a green card.

    "My employer and I spent tens of thousands of dollars preparing for the day when we could file for our Change in Status application, only to have the [government] pull the rug out from under us," said Lawrence LeBlanc, a Canadian executive at AES Corp. in Arlington, Virginia. "We were devastated to hear this unprecedented news. We're not sure how we're going to tell our children."

    Because there are more employer-based applicants for immigrant visas than are available each year, people wait each month to see whether they have gotten to the front of the line. Often people wait years for the green light to apply, especially if they come from countries like India and China.

    The June 12 announcement set off a stampede to government-approved doctors, because green-card applicants must pass medical exams. Apurva Pratap, a Seattle-based senior manager for a multinational corporation, said he and his wife traveled 40 miles for a medical exam after they couldn't secure an appointment in town. To fulfill a requirement for a vaccination, they waited eight hours in a line that snaked around a mobile unit in Tacoma. Mr. Pratap, a native of India, has been in the U.S. since 1999.

    A spokeswoman for the American Immigration Lawyers Association said it has called for a congressional investigation. An affiliated organization is expected to take legal action via a class-action lawsuit. "This is an example of how badly our immigration system is broken," says Kathleen Walker, president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

    Write to Miriam Jordan at miriam.jordan@wsj.com1



    more...


    picture of selena gomez mom and dad. selena gomez mom dad
  • selena gomez mom dad



  • senthil1
    04-21 10:11 AM
    No bill was introduced in Senate. Where is the question of voting? If anti immigrants some how make waste these 2 weeks of time in Senate then there will not be enough time to discuss. Now 60% chance. If no bill is introduced in Senate before end of may it will come down to 40%.

    I believe it was House committee hearing http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=299





    hair ♥Selena Gomez and The Scene♥ picture of selena gomez mom and dad. who is selena gomez mom and
  • who is selena gomez mom and



  • paskal
    08-23 11:51 PM
    I believe that several people have won WOM cases....

    I also hear that Sheila Murthy is planning to file a WOM with a large group of clients to offset cost.

    Might be worth getting a second opinion with an attorney that's filed and won WOM cases....

    welcome to IV!



    more...


    picture of selena gomez mom and dad. bieber#39;s mom and dad
  • bieber#39;s mom and dad



  • Blog Feeds
    02-05 06:40 PM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:



    By Eleanor Pelta, AILA First Vice President

    H-1B workers certainly seem to be under fire these days on many fronts. A new memo issued by USCIS on the employer-employee relationship imposes new extra-regulatory regulations on the types of activities in which H-1B workers can engage as well as the types of enterprises that can petition for H-1B workers. The memo targets the consulting industry directly, deftly slips in a new concept that seems to prohibit H-1B petitions for employer-owners of businesses, and will surely constitute an open invitation to the Service Centers to hit H-1B petitioners with a new slew of kitchen-sink RFE's. On another front, USCIS continues to make unannounced H-1B site visits, often repeatedly to the same employer. Apart from the "in-terrorem" impact of such visits, I personally cannot see the utility of three different visits to the same employer, particularly after the first one or two visits show that the employer is fully compliant.

    But USCIS isn't the only agency that is rigorously targeting H-1B's. An AILA member recently reported that CBP pulled newly-arrived Indian nationals holding H-1B visas out of an immigration inspection line and reportedly placed them in Expedited Removal. The legal basis of those actions is still unclear. However, the tactic is too close to racial profiling for my own comfort.

    Finally, recent H-1B "skirmishes" include various U.S. consular posts in India issuing "pink letters" that are, simply put, consular "RFE's" appearing to question the bona fides of the H-1B and requesting information on a host of truly repetitive and/or irrelevant topics. Much of the information that is routinely requested on a pink letter is already in the copy of the H-1B visa petition. Some of the letters request payroll information for all employees of the sponsoring company, a ridiculous request in most instances, particularly for major multi-national companies. One of the most frustrating actions we are seeing from consular officers in this context is the checking off or highlighting of every single category of additional information on the form letter, whether directly applicable or not, in effect a "paper wall" that must be overcome before an applicant can have the H-1B visa issued. Very discouraging to both employer and employee.

    How have we come to a point in time where the H-1B category in and of itself is so disdained and mistrusted? Of course I'm aware that instances of fraud have cast this category in a bad light. But I think that vehemence of the administrative attack on the H-1B category is so disproportionate to the actual statistics about fraud. And interestingly, the disproportionate heavy-handed administrative reaction comes not from the agency specifically tasked with H-1B enforcement�the Department of Labor�but from CIS, CBP and State. Sometimes I just have to shake my head and ask myself what makes people so darn angry about a visa category that, at bottom, is designed to bring in relatively tiny number of really smart people to work in U.S. businesses of any size. It has to be a reaction against something else.

    Yes, a great number of IT consultants come to the US on H-1B's. It is important to remember that so many of these individuals are extremely well-educated, capable people, working in an industry in which there are a large number of high profile players. And arguably, the high profile consulting companies have the most at stake if they do not focus on compliance, as they are the easiest enforcement target and they need their business model to work in the U.S. in order to survive. Some people may not like the business model, although arguably IT consulting companies provide needed services that allow US businesses, such as banks and insurance companies to focus on their own core strengths. Like it or not, though, this business model is perfectly legal under current law, and the agencies that enforce our immigration laws have no business trying to eviscerate it by policy or a pattern of discretionary actions.

    It is true that some IT consulting companies' practices have been the focus of fraud investigations. But DOL has stringent rules in place to deal with the bad guys. Benching H-1B workers without pay, paying below the prevailing wage, sending H-1B workers on long-term assignments to a site not covered by an LCA�these are the practices we most often hear about, and every single one of these is a violation of an existing regulation that could be enforced by the Department of Labor. When an employer violates wage and hour rules, DOL investigates the practices and enforces the regulations against that employer. But no one shuts down an entire industry as a result.

    And the IT consulting industry is not the only user of the H-1B visa. Let's not forget how many other critical fields use H-1B workers. In my own career alone, I have seen H-1B petitions for nanoscientists, ornithologists, CEO's of significant not for profit organizations, teachers, applied mathematicians, risk analysts, professionals involved in pharmaceutical research and development, automotive designers, international legal experts, film editors, microimaging engineers. H-1B's are valuable to small and large businesses alike, arguably even more to that emerging business that needs one key expert to develop a new product or service and get the business off the ground.


    The assault on H-1B's is not only offensive, it's dangerous. Here's why:




    H-1B's create jobs�statistics show that 5 jobs are created in the U.S. for every H-1B worker hired. An administrative clamp-down in the program will hinder this job creation. And think about the valuable sharing of skills and expertise between H-1B workers and U.S. workers�this is lost when companies are discouraged from using the program.
    The anti-H-1B assault dissuades large businesses from conducting research and development in the US, and encourages the relocation of those facilities in jurisdictions that are friendlier to foreign professionals.
    The anti-H-1B assault chills the formation of small businesses in the US, particularly in emerging technologies. This will most certainly be one of the long-term results of USCIS' most recent memo.
    The attack on H-1B's offends our friends and allies in the world. An example: Earlier this year India �one of the U.S.'s closest allies --announced new visa restrictions on foreign nationals working there. Surely the treatment of Indian national H-1B workers at the hands of our agencies involved in the immigration process would not have escaped the attention of the Indian government as they issued their own restrictions.
    The increasing challenges in the H-1B program may have the effect of encouraging foreign students who were educated in the U.S. to seek permanent positions elsewhere.
    Whatever the cause of the visceral reaction against H-1B workers might be�whether it stems from a fear that fraud will become more widespread or whether it is simply a broader reaction against foreign workers that often raises its head during any down economy �I sincerely hope that the agencies are able to gain some perspective on the program that allows them to treat legitimate H-1B employers and employees with the respect they deserve and to effectively enforce against those who are non-compliant, rather than casting a wide net and treating all H-1B users as abusers.
    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7575642888668204601?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/02/why-is-h-1b-dirty-word.html)





    hot Selena Gomez Is Happy To Live picture of selena gomez mom and dad. selena gomez mom and dad
  • selena gomez mom and dad



  • me_myself
    12-19 05:08 PM
    I found this while searching. That matches my scenario exactly - Please let me know if what the users have posted is accurate. i.e., i can be in india (without payroll) till my h1 validity - this would not have my h1 revoked.

    http://murthyforum.atinfopop.com/4/OpenTopic?a=tpc&s=1024039761&f=4234032861&m=5481010971

    Thanks.



    more...


    house selena gomez outfits for picture of selena gomez mom and dad. selena gomez mom and dad
  • selena gomez mom and dad



  • AnandNJ
    06-27 03:04 PM
    No, you can not get a copy of I-140 by USCIS
    except your employer or attorney, one of my friend called attorneys office when attorney is not in the office paralegal answered and he requested her a copy of approval she sent but attorney may not give you. However there is a form of I-824 to get a duplicate copy but its useful to employers not for beneficiary. USCIS will not send duplicate of I-140 copy to beneficiary.

    If you want to port your older priority date, having I-140 approval is good but that not required, meaning if you have I-140 receipt number thats good enough to port.





    tattoo selena gomez#39;s mom and dad picture of selena gomez mom and dad. selena gomez mom and dad
  • selena gomez mom and dad



  • Pineapple
    08-05 08:27 PM
    I have to self file I-765. My 485 filed by employer to Lincoln, Nebraska. Address not know to me.

    Please some one post where i can send my 765 application before Aug 17.

    Thanks

    If you are mailing via courier, then send it to

    USCIS
    Nebraska Service Center
    850 S. Street
    Lincoln, NE 68508-1225

    Hope this helps.



    more...


    pictures The totally adorable Selena picture of selena gomez mom and dad. mom and dad middot; selena gomez
  • mom and dad middot; selena gomez



  • CheckRaise
    10-09 06:12 PM
    Thanks for the responses! Sorry to reply both responses in the same thread.

    No, I havent got any audit (atleast thats what the employer/attrny says). I keep asking them for screenshot/update and getting nothing. There is already a case of a friend's(PD-Sep 08) whose constant request for information was sidelined and finally in May 09 he was told his PERM was approved in Feb 09. That was total BS, fearing something is amiss I started off on a screenshot request and I am getting stiffed saying DOL is a big pain and hard to pull up cases. I am already running on my 7th year and this BS has my blood boiling over.

    I agree with the second poster's response on the thread that its BS that its hard to pull data. Its either they dont want me to worry or they dont want me to know the case number or detail. I am inclined more towards they dont want me to know the status because on numerous trackers I see Dec '08 being processed and not even whiff on my filing something very rotten is going on. :mad:





    dresses selena gomez mom and dad picture of selena gomez mom and dad. Selena Gomez Mom And Dad
  • Selena Gomez Mom And Dad



  • factoryman
    06-18 01:08 PM
    I doubt it. As far as I know only HIV from the blood drawn. I will look into the copies the doctor gave me.
    All
    First of all, sorry to open a new thread for my problem, but didn't find a related thread.

    I was tested positive for genetal herpes 6months ago, but after that i didn't have any outbreaks. Now i have to go for medicals for my I485 next week.
    Iam very much worried if it will effect my chances of getting GC.
    Should i let the civil surgeon know iam positive for herpes and show my medical reports before he does the blood work, or should i wait till he finishes my blood work? I have read that i can apply for a waiver even if im tested positive for herpes, is it true? If so, can any body please tell me what is the procedure? Do i need to do it when we are filing for 485, or is it a separate process?

    Please guide me.

    Thanks in advance.



    more...


    makeup selena gomez mom dad picture of selena gomez mom and dad. selena gomez outfits for
  • selena gomez outfits for



  • ramboom1
    03-28 07:55 AM
    I saw the document and also the table at the end of the document. It is hard to understand this table. Can I please suggest that such sensitive numbers be made easy to undertsand? Thanks!
    Virtual,

    That is exactly what we are doing. The memo didn't just miraculously appear at BIB Daily.:) I emailed him, others got in touch with Matthew Oh etc.

    best,
    Berkeleybee





    girlfriend selena gomez mom and dad picture of selena gomez mom and dad. selena gomez with justin
  • selena gomez with justin



  • iv_only_hope
    01-15 10:20 AM
    Update from my lawyers site

    For China-mainland born EB-2, if demand remains as has been seen over the last couple of months, it is expected that the 01 JAN 03 cut-off date will hold, and it is likely that all numbers will be used within the current cut-off date. The State Dept. has ssured that it is looking for mechanisms to maximize number usage so that no visa numbers remain unallocated, and is looking for ways to make additional India and China-mainland born numbers available, such as by making sure that unused numbers that had been sent to consular posts are promptly returned





    hairstyles bieber#39;s mom and dad picture of selena gomez mom and dad. selena gomez with justin
  • selena gomez with justin



  • alterego
    02-20 09:44 PM
    Thanks for the correction Googler. I transposed the % into a K value! My bad. However my larger point remains.





    Sachin_Stock
    09-14 06:09 AM
    Nobody's a slave. Each one of us can decide for ourselves, whether to stay around, or go back. You will be getting decently paid in either case. I used to feel the same, but then there's a saying in Sanskrit "Raja Kalasya Karanam" (The king is responsible for his own destiny. This is in reference to Mahabharat's Dhritirasthra)





    FinalGC
    05-10 04:50 PM
    I do not think USCIS declares that as a status, since u r in "LIMBO" status when in EAD or doing adjustment of your status, from previous to current.

    If something negative happens to your case...you immediately become illegal status......So this is why all lawyers recommend to keep your h1 status valid, when you file your 485. Getting into EAD is a risk, which some bold take and survive, others like me who try to play safe....stay on H1 until the 485 is approved.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment