gveerab
08-25 06:25 PM
:)
No E2 (EB2) consular processing cases were scheduled by mumbai consulate.
Mumbai consulate - Consular Processing appointments
September
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/uploads/images/eKYmGhGmUU2-9o2l0sVwDg/IV_APPNTS_0908.pdf
August
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/uploads/images/ijH_SNSNIxW4rcRSdtw44Q/IVAPPNTS0808.pdf
Give me a green dot if you can.
No E2 (EB2) consular processing cases were scheduled by mumbai consulate.
Mumbai consulate - Consular Processing appointments
September
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/uploads/images/eKYmGhGmUU2-9o2l0sVwDg/IV_APPNTS_0908.pdf
August
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/uploads/images/ijH_SNSNIxW4rcRSdtw44Q/IVAPPNTS0808.pdf
Give me a green dot if you can.
wallpaper Nigel Lythgoe possible return
gcisadawg
03-24 11:02 PM
I've heard about AC21. What is AC360 - some new USCIS provision ?
google?
google?
sargon
09-22 10:22 AM
Soft LUD on pending I-485 on 9/19/08.
The Audacity of hope...
The Audacity of hope...
2011 Nigel Lythgoe
IVFOREVER
02-13 04:39 PM
I think you need to wait till you have EB2 numbers available or else you need to with draw the inter filing before your I-140 assumes the eb3 priority date.The withdrawl my trigger RFE.That is my openion.Gurus correct me.
more...
rajbgp2002
01-17 12:57 PM
Different service center case number starts with different letters.
My case is same as yours. Earlier it used to be EAC, the latest one is WAC.
You should be able to use WACXXX... for online tracking.
My case is same as yours. Earlier it used to be EAC, the latest one is WAC.
You should be able to use WACXXX... for online tracking.
BMS1
11-02 05:47 PM
1. You can work with EAD for whomever you want.
2. Technically someone may be able to establish that this is legal. But you may have to be very careful and may end up having to prove that both you and the original sponsor had real intent to have the employment relationship and may have to explain why that intent could not be translated to reality. If your explanation is not satisfactory to the adjudication officer (this ia a subjective matter), he can treat the whole affair as fraud and you will have your hands full for a long time.
This is my opinion.
2. Technically someone may be able to establish that this is legal. But you may have to be very careful and may end up having to prove that both you and the original sponsor had real intent to have the employment relationship and may have to explain why that intent could not be translated to reality. If your explanation is not satisfactory to the adjudication officer (this ia a subjective matter), he can treat the whole affair as fraud and you will have your hands full for a long time.
This is my opinion.
more...
kaisersose
07-17 11:08 PM
This is where the lawyer comes in. Or someone who has been through this can describe his experience.
As long as your resume and experience letters match you with the Labor, you are good. eb3 is less riskier than eb2.
For peace of mind, you can get a second opinion from another attorney by having him match your profile with the substituted Labor.
As long as your resume and experience letters match you with the Labor, you are good. eb3 is less riskier than eb2.
For peace of mind, you can get a second opinion from another attorney by having him match your profile with the substituted Labor.
2010 Nigel Lythgoe picture gallery
niklshah
09-07 12:12 PM
see you at dc...
more...
Blog Feeds
07-08 11:30 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
hair 09/24/2008 - Nigel Lythgoe
moonrah
07-26 09:47 PM
Hi Rosebell,
Thanks for the reply. How to show that labor is pending for more than one year? How to get a proof for that? Can I get it from any website?
Thanks,
Thanks for the reply. How to show that labor is pending for more than one year? How to get a proof for that? Can I get it from any website?
Thanks,
more...
birdwing
07-24 06:29 PM
what is the purpose of this?
If it is to share comments between people working on the same project, it would probably be easier to convert it to xps and use document viewer to see it. And then the comments could be saved as a .txt file and sent with the other file.
Thats my 2 cents although it would be cool to get it working the way you first envisioned.
If it is to share comments between people working on the same project, it would probably be easier to convert it to xps and use document viewer to see it. And then the comments could be saved as a .txt file and sent with the other file.
Thats my 2 cents although it would be cool to get it working the way you first envisioned.
hot Nigel Lythgoe
eb2_immigrant
08-01 05:30 PM
I called USCIS to check the status of my pending I-485,PD-Dec2005. I was told they are processing applications with ND in July . My RD-2 July 2007 ,ND -28 Aug 2007.
Since there was no email or online update about my approved AP,I-131, I asked rep to check the status out of curiosity, I was told that case is still pending and they are processing April 2008 applications.
Here is the weird part; I received my approved AP 4 days back. How did that happen ????:eek::eek::eek: I donno.
I know the online status is out of sync. My questions -Is this something I need worry about and call USICS to let them know that I have already received approved AP. I donno what�s going on with my other applications. Should I just wait to see the results in the mail and not rely on online status??
Gurus and thopes pls help
Since there was no email or online update about my approved AP,I-131, I asked rep to check the status out of curiosity, I was told that case is still pending and they are processing April 2008 applications.
Here is the weird part; I received my approved AP 4 days back. How did that happen ????:eek::eek::eek: I donno.
I know the online status is out of sync. My questions -Is this something I need worry about and call USICS to let them know that I have already received approved AP. I donno what�s going on with my other applications. Should I just wait to see the results in the mail and not rely on online status??
Gurus and thopes pls help
more...
house Nigel Lythgoe Image
apahilaj
09-12 02:08 PM
What does this mean?
On September 10, 2007, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I765 APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service.
Does it mean that they mailed the letter that it is approved or did they mail the card?
If your current status says approval notice sent that means your EAD card is on it's way. Wait for approx a week to receive it in your mailbox.
On September 10, 2007, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I765 APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service.
Does it mean that they mailed the letter that it is approved or did they mail the card?
If your current status says approval notice sent that means your EAD card is on it's way. Wait for approx a week to receive it in your mailbox.
tattoo Nigel Lythgoe, who served as
rollercoaster
03-27 10:52 PM
Somebody please reply.
more...
pictures Nigel Lythgoe at 2011 BAFTA
chanduv23
09-13 08:08 AM
whatever I did here on this video - I want to dedicate it to my wife. She is doing her 2nd year residency and is carrying (5th month) - and has been putting up with me when I could not give her 100% attention.
My dear friends
- it is the duty of every immigrant to stand up and respect the nation.
- yes, 300K applications reached in July - everyone wants to be here, and it will make a big difference if you all show your faces aty the rally.
Volunteers at Immigration Voice have been working 24/7 with strategy and planning - everything for us only.
We all come from different backgrounds, highly skilled, work hard and have a illustrious career, at the same time, we must also not forget that we can all stand up together, yes - we can do it.
Lets all March on September 18th at Washington DC and show all the anti immigrants and hate spreaders like Lou Dobbs, Ron Hira etc.. their dirty tricks won't work anymore.
Lets all cooperate - this is the time - JUST ONE DAY AT WASHINGTON DC.
EVERYONE MUST BE THERE
My dear friends
- it is the duty of every immigrant to stand up and respect the nation.
- yes, 300K applications reached in July - everyone wants to be here, and it will make a big difference if you all show your faces aty the rally.
Volunteers at Immigration Voice have been working 24/7 with strategy and planning - everything for us only.
We all come from different backgrounds, highly skilled, work hard and have a illustrious career, at the same time, we must also not forget that we can all stand up together, yes - we can do it.
Lets all March on September 18th at Washington DC and show all the anti immigrants and hate spreaders like Lou Dobbs, Ron Hira etc.. their dirty tricks won't work anymore.
Lets all cooperate - this is the time - JUST ONE DAY AT WASHINGTON DC.
EVERYONE MUST BE THERE
dresses executive Nigel Lythgoe of
pappu
10-16 12:43 PM
If you are suffering from Namechecks and have a compelling story, pls post in brief on this thread. We will use your stories while speaking with lawmakers and reporters. You may also be asked to speak to the media. Please make sure your profile is complete. No anonymous members please.
more...
makeup Dish Of Salt: Nigel Lythgoe
satishku_2000
05-27 05:02 PM
Bumping up
girlfriend Nigel Lythgoe about doing
perm2gc
09-15 10:59 AM
Hi,
My EB2 labor PD 12/2002 is in Philadelphai backlog center. With the online backlog case status now available, I wanted to find out about my case.
However, lawyer is not giving my case number. Is there any way to find out. Gurus please help with suggestions.
Thanks
Talking to your employer is better than asking attorney.Sometimes Attorny dont respond to the candidate.
My EB2 labor PD 12/2002 is in Philadelphai backlog center. With the online backlog case status now available, I wanted to find out about my case.
However, lawyer is not giving my case number. Is there any way to find out. Gurus please help with suggestions.
Thanks
Talking to your employer is better than asking attorney.Sometimes Attorny dont respond to the candidate.
hairstyles According to sources, Nigel Lythgoe, producer and judge of So You Think You
dealsnet
11-16 10:28 AM
See a lawyer. He can find out the better job description for you.
He need to file LCA according to these job title.
Consult a reputed lawyer.
I'm on my OPT, basically student F1 visa.
The thing is the company where I work is ready to sponsor me. They only don't know which occupation to write for me in order to be eligible for H1B.
I'm working over there on administrative position and doing various accounting things.
Thanks
He need to file LCA according to these job title.
Consult a reputed lawyer.
I'm on my OPT, basically student F1 visa.
The thing is the company where I work is ready to sponsor me. They only don't know which occupation to write for me in order to be eligible for H1B.
I'm working over there on administrative position and doing various accounting things.
Thanks
eb3_nepa
05-28 11:20 AM
If you are actually using the EAD you cannot work in the interim though. Just an FYI
IneedAllGreen
06-22 09:48 PM
Thanks man. Appreciated.
INeedAllGreen
<today�s date>
US Department of Homeland Security
United States Citizenship and Immigration Service
<your USCIS Service Center address>
<signature, name and designation of authorized person>
<company name>
INeedAllGreen
<today�s date>
US Department of Homeland Security
United States Citizenship and Immigration Service
<your USCIS Service Center address>
<signature, name and designation of authorized person>
<company name>
No comments:
Post a Comment