rameshms
10-24 02:33 PM
The RFE was for biographic information of the passport (basically a photo identity matching the name). It appears that my lawyer may have missed sending separate copies of it for each application (485/765/131). Anyway I sent color copies of the passport pages as well as driver license. The status for the application changed to "Response to request for evidence received on 10/09/2007 and processing resumed".
As far as your FP notices, I have read that others have been able to get the notices after calling the Service Center customer service. You might want to consider that.
Ramesh
can u share pl.
As far as your FP notices, I have read that others have been able to get the notices after calling the Service Center customer service. You might want to consider that.
Ramesh
can u share pl.
wallpaper Green River Killer suspected
geesee
07-07 02:54 PM
Yes, its possible. The only conditions are - your port of entry MUST be Newark, NJ & you MUST rent the apartment at Whitehall Gardens, Somerset.
If you dont meet any of these, USCIS will not allow you to convert from visitor to H1B
If you dont meet any of these, USCIS will not allow you to convert from visitor to H1B
payal_nag
02-26 12:44 PM
Hello All,
I have a few questions for the group. I have an approved labor and I-140 in EB3 category with a 2005 priority date. My 7th year H1 expires on May 11 2007 and my company has already filed for my 3 year H1 extension based on my approved I-140 which will be valid from May 2007 to May 2010. My questions are the following:
1) Can I change my employer and keep my 2005 priority date if the new employer also agrees to file a fresh PERM app and I-140 for me?
2) If I qualify for EB2 category, can my new employer file for I-140 in EB2 category and still maintain the old priority date?
3) Since my current visa is valid till May 11 2007 and new visa will be valid from May 12 2007, can i start work for a new employer in April 2007 based on my new 3 year H1 or do I have to wait till May 2007 to start work on the new visa?
Any help will be greatly appreciaited.
Thanks
I have a few questions for the group. I have an approved labor and I-140 in EB3 category with a 2005 priority date. My 7th year H1 expires on May 11 2007 and my company has already filed for my 3 year H1 extension based on my approved I-140 which will be valid from May 2007 to May 2010. My questions are the following:
1) Can I change my employer and keep my 2005 priority date if the new employer also agrees to file a fresh PERM app and I-140 for me?
2) If I qualify for EB2 category, can my new employer file for I-140 in EB2 category and still maintain the old priority date?
3) Since my current visa is valid till May 11 2007 and new visa will be valid from May 12 2007, can i start work for a new employer in April 2007 based on my new 3 year H1 or do I have to wait till May 2007 to start work on the new visa?
Any help will be greatly appreciaited.
Thanks
2011 green river killer movie.
looivy
10-11 02:50 PM
I am a labour substitution case pd feb 2002 filed 140 in June at NSC. My 140 has been pending for more than a year. Now recently I received 2 year ead.
Does this imply my 140 is approved too???
Is it safe to work on ead of one gets 2 year ead with pending 140.??
please advice.
I do not understand why they grant EADs when your I-140 is not approved. The reason I bring this up is if a person loses his/her job and your I-140 is revoked, the EAD is useless. You cannot use AC21 for that because your I-140 is not approved.
Nebraska center is doing nothing regarding I-140 EB-3 (India) apps. The I-140 date at Nebraska has beeing moving by 1 day per month for the last 7-8 months. It is stuck at March 30th 2007. Moreover, the latest "as of" i.e. "report" date that you see on Nebraska is July 31st 2008. It is not current (Sept 2008) as many of you may think.
I understand that they receive 1000s of applications but that is no excuse for incompetence. As of July 31st, it was taking them 1 year and 4 months and now it is 1 year and 6 months to process I-140.
Why don't they re-institute expedited I-140 approval?
Can IV please help us?
Does this imply my 140 is approved too???
Is it safe to work on ead of one gets 2 year ead with pending 140.??
please advice.
I do not understand why they grant EADs when your I-140 is not approved. The reason I bring this up is if a person loses his/her job and your I-140 is revoked, the EAD is useless. You cannot use AC21 for that because your I-140 is not approved.
Nebraska center is doing nothing regarding I-140 EB-3 (India) apps. The I-140 date at Nebraska has beeing moving by 1 day per month for the last 7-8 months. It is stuck at March 30th 2007. Moreover, the latest "as of" i.e. "report" date that you see on Nebraska is July 31st 2008. It is not current (Sept 2008) as many of you may think.
I understand that they receive 1000s of applications but that is no excuse for incompetence. As of July 31st, it was taking them 1 year and 4 months and now it is 1 year and 6 months to process I-140.
Why don't they re-institute expedited I-140 approval?
Can IV please help us?
more...
jcrajput
10-24 03:01 PM
My EB2- I140 (INDIA) approved on March 09, 2007. We also have received our EAD last year after filing I-485 in July 2007.
I was checking online status and for my I-140, last updated date shows January 06, 2008. (My EB2 PD is OCT 2006). Can any one explain why the I-140 showing update date of 01/06/2008. The online status says following text :
Application Type: I140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER
Current Status: Case approved; approval notice e-mailed.
On March 9, 2007, this I140 IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER was approved and we sent you an e-mail notice. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service.
I am little bit confuse.
I appriciate your help.
Thank you.
I was checking online status and for my I-140, last updated date shows January 06, 2008. (My EB2 PD is OCT 2006). Can any one explain why the I-140 showing update date of 01/06/2008. The online status says following text :
Application Type: I140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER
Current Status: Case approved; approval notice e-mailed.
On March 9, 2007, this I140 IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER was approved and we sent you an e-mail notice. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service.
I am little bit confuse.
I appriciate your help.
Thank you.
sdrblr
05-02 09:33 PM
you are nobody to the middle vendor and he has no contract or anything with you. Whether he pays your employer or not is none of your business... it is for those two to figure out.
Legally your employer has to pay you whether he is getting paid or not. If you want that $$$ complain against your employer before he closes the shop and files bankruptcy.
Legally your employer has to pay you whether he is getting paid or not. If you want that $$$ complain against your employer before he closes the shop and files bankruptcy.
more...
_480x360.jpg "2010 the green river killer")
loudobbs
08-02 03:19 PM
Hi Folks
My Labor was approved under EB2 as the job required a Master's Degree but the Lawyer by mistake filed my I140 under EB3 and was approved Oct 2006. The mistake was noticed in May 2007 when we were planning to file for I485. The lawyer refiled my I140 under premium processing on may 23 2007. I checked the status on line and the LUD is May 27 saying application was received. The lawyer told me that CIS is waiting for 'original labor notice' from the labor dept.
Its been 2 months now and I am getting worried.
Anyone who has been in similar circumstances or familiar with this situation pl help. :(
My Labor was approved under EB2 as the job required a Master's Degree but the Lawyer by mistake filed my I140 under EB3 and was approved Oct 2006. The mistake was noticed in May 2007 when we were planning to file for I485. The lawyer refiled my I140 under premium processing on may 23 2007. I checked the status on line and the LUD is May 27 saying application was received. The lawyer told me that CIS is waiting for 'original labor notice' from the labor dept.
Its been 2 months now and I am getting worried.
Anyone who has been in similar circumstances or familiar with this situation pl help. :(
2010 wallpaper Green River Killer
dhirajgrover
04-16 05:06 PM
Sorry, I misunderstood you, but that has not been shared by the employer.
more...
monkeyman
10-19 11:44 AM
BUMP - Please comment
hair home in Green River, Wyo.,
handless
04-16 03:21 PM
Well glad you like it i do agree it is a bit gory but most the stuff i do is gory i dont know i guess it comes from my obsession with horror and slasher flicks.
more...
VMH_GC
07-23 08:17 PM
Bump ^^^^^^
hot Be the first to comment. Gary
Blog Feeds
11-14 04:21 AM
This is key. We've been hearing that the White House was still up in the air between the energy bill and immigration and that one of the two would likely be pushed back until after the election. Now it looks like the White House thinks it can walk and chew gum (presumably after the President's approval ratings are slipping as people sense the White House is not actually keeping any of its promises).
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/11/white-house-signals-immigration-reform-efforts-definitely-a-go-for-2010-.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/11/white-house-signals-immigration-reform-efforts-definitely-a-go-for-2010-.html)
more...
house green river killer victims.
ajmal744
02-21 12:18 PM
Hi ajmal!
It is not possible currently to get the full height of your entire image composition.
Cheers!
Kirupa
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I was wondering how the engine is calculating the scaling of the image to change the ViewPort, while zooming in and out. Does the change of ViewPort and the image composition within it depends only on the viewport width?
I have not able to find much greater details on this yet from MS. Would you be able to direct me please to some materials to understand more on Multiscale image control and its working in and out.
Cheers
Ajmal
It is not possible currently to get the full height of your entire image composition.
Cheers!
Kirupa
Thanks a lot for your reply.
I was wondering how the engine is calculating the scaling of the image to change the ViewPort, while zooming in and out. Does the change of ViewPort and the image composition within it depends only on the viewport width?
I have not able to find much greater details on this yet from MS. Would you be able to direct me please to some materials to understand more on Multiscale image control and its working in and out.
Cheers
Ajmal
tattoo as the Green River Killer,
GotFreedom?
06-01 01:26 PM
can you really claim refund? Is there any rule?
It is specifically mentioned in the forms and online when you file for any applications that USCIS is unable to process any refunds requested by applicants regardless of an error in the application, withdrawal of application or an error on the USCIS's part. The wordings may not be exactly the same but in a nutshell they are saying "NO REFUNDS!!!"
I noticed it when I applied for EAD online and thought I goofed up the application and see what my options are.
I hope this helps.
It is specifically mentioned in the forms and online when you file for any applications that USCIS is unable to process any refunds requested by applicants regardless of an error in the application, withdrawal of application or an error on the USCIS's part. The wordings may not be exactly the same but in a nutshell they are saying "NO REFUNDS!!!"
I noticed it when I applied for EAD online and thought I goofed up the application and see what my options are.
I hope this helps.
more...
pictures 2010 the green river killer
god_bless_you
03-28 01:20 PM
Is there any similar organization in Tri-State Area?
dresses green river killer movie.
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVIxpGIsrzNYUrIEpZN2jDaSbE1XP90ofHA4eqP8yn-Y8tUprsP6V4gnx5Dt-nmBejycCe3u2x68BtkrpQ0eVG2mb0oC0Laa4erVMKR-xJK5gu-OcM8omGgywuyE7cCIzJLlFs3hdZkc4/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVIxpGIsrzNYUrIEpZN2jDaSbE1XP90ofHA4eqP8yn-Y8tUprsP6V4gnx5Dt-nmBejycCe3u2x68BtkrpQ0eVG2mb0oC0Laa4erVMKR-xJK5gu-OcM8omGgywuyE7cCIzJLlFs3hdZkc4/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVIxpGIsrzNYUrIEpZN2jDaSbE1XP90ofHA4eqP8yn-Y8tUprsP6V4gnx5Dt-nmBejycCe3u2x68BtkrpQ0eVG2mb0oC0Laa4erVMKR-xJK5gu-OcM8omGgywuyE7cCIzJLlFs3hdZkc4/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVIxpGIsrzNYUrIEpZN2jDaSbE1XP90ofHA4eqP8yn-Y8tUprsP6V4gnx5Dt-nmBejycCe3u2x68BtkrpQ0eVG2mb0oC0Laa4erVMKR-xJK5gu-OcM8omGgywuyE7cCIzJLlFs3hdZkc4/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
more...
makeup the “Green River Killer”
preety79
11-06 01:32 PM
I�m in EB2 and My I-140 was approved on March 2009 through Employer A. After which I moved to India and now am back (Nov 2010) with Employer B. My old Employer A has my apporved I-140.
It would be great if I get answer the below my Question:
1. Can I apply for I-485 with my new employer B based on my approved 140?? OR
2. Do I need to go back to my old employer A to apply my I-485. If yes is there any specific time period to go back to my old employer A.
Thanks for your help.
preety
It would be great if I get answer the below my Question:
1. Can I apply for I-485 with my new employer B based on my approved 140?? OR
2. Do I need to go back to my old employer A to apply my I-485. If yes is there any specific time period to go back to my old employer A.
Thanks for your help.
preety
girlfriend green river killer helen
kirupa
08-09 09:16 PM
Sorry - I am having a great deal of difficulty understanding your question or the problem you are trying to solve.
What is the draft? What properties are you trying to change?
What is the draft? What properties are you trying to change?
hairstyles Green River Killer: A
vin69
02-10 10:07 PM
Thanks raj2007 and ras for your response
excogitator
10-18 11:37 AM
I don't see any limitation here. Very creative :) I like them all.
sfxman
05-09 05:05 PM
Mine is around 10K for Europe so I should be fine...
Best of luck to you...
Best of luck to you...
No comments:
Post a Comment